Grassroots Network of the Republican Party of Virginia

Our Constitution’s Original Intent & The Effect of Progressive Erosion by Dissemblance and Equivocation

1) The power that gives meaning to words of a valid contract is the meeting of the minds.  Without that meeting of the minds the contract is merely a cover for fraud. The same holds true for any social compact or covenant such as our Constitution.

For this reason the evidence of original intent is cornerstone to every interpretation of our Constitution that is not prone to equivocation dissemblance and logical fallacy that when knowingly and willingly committed to effect a citizens dispossession of their true Constitution constitutes state and federal felonies such as 18USC1341 “Frauds & Swindles”,  Va18.2-481(5) Statutory Treason and Va18.2-111. 

Witnesses to those felonies are bound by law to effectively raise a remedy against the witnessed felonies.  The law binding that duty to all citizens is in:

18USC4 “Misprision of Felony”  from http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00000004...,

18USC2382 “Misprision of Treason     from http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00002382----000-.html

the equivalent statutes in our state law and

the equivalent raising of “Hue & Cry” of our embraced by statute, English Common Law.


Views: 20

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

2) Scope of Remedies

2a) NEVER can such 18USC1341 “Frauds & Swindles”, Va18.2-481(5) Statutory Treason and Va18.2-111 felony be within the bounds of a government office’s authority – ALL such felony are in personal capacity of the perpetrating officer only.

2b) NEVER can such felony be lawfully conceited as a right. – no matter the color of law applied to that felony.

2c) AND So long as one party may reach the other’s remedy, no statute of limitations can block lawfully remedy.

2d) Notices how every contract, compact or corporate constitution is illegal and void if contrary to our sovereign people’s law (Va§1-248 at http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+1-248 ).

2e) Notice that the meeting of the minds referred to in the paragraph 1) and 2d) must occur within the context of the meeting of the minds of the duly authorized and ratified representatives of the sovereign people - making the sovereign people party to the meeting of the minds by context in every lawful meeting of the minds memorialized in every non void contract, compact or corporate constitution.

2f) Take notice that every contract, compact or constitution would be a vain aspiration if that meeting of the minds was contrary to the “Laws of Nature and Natures God”.
For that reason every valid contract’s meeting of the minds must include, at least so much as to be ratified by, the Author of the “Laws of Nature and Natures God”. Whether intentional, or not, that must be so else the contract is vain, void or fraud - regardless of vain protests to the contrary.

3) In detail of 2c) note that reach the Author of the “Laws of Nature and Natures God”s remedy exceeds the reach of the sovereign people’s, which exceeds the reach of a person’s remedy. Unless that is, the person has unalienable right to remedy in the Author of the “Laws of Nature and Natures God”.

The above appears so entirely consistent with the Constitution of Virginia and Virginia’s laws that it appears to be the first principles of “Laws of Nature and Natures God” that drives those particulars into existence. As such the above appears to be the law that God has commonly hidden within our hearts – to spring forth when provoked by the intersection of our need and our strength to bear so much of the truth’s fullness.

If I am mistaken please let me know.
If reliably true there are highly practical consequences that enables a widely agreeable 'Constitutional Reset' in the very near future.


Reply to Discussion









(sales help fund this site)




© 2020   Created by Tom Whitmore.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service