RPVNetwork

Grassroots Network of the Republican Party of Virginia

In response to BHO’s loss of dignity challenge to the TPM 

IDENTIFY, SPECIFICALLY, WHAT WOULD YOU DO?


http://www.songoftruth.org/forum/topics/obama-and-what-he-thinks-of


BHO doesn't have a clue as to how to handle the Tea Party Movement.


Given BHO's vaporous connection to reality and 500,000 TPM leaders telling him the news it is a mercy that he has not had a stroke - just think who might replace him - much better the devil we know, Eh? What do you say we write and give him a clue?


TPM Leaders GIVE BHO A CLUE CHAMPAIGN


DEAR MR. COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF-OF-UNCERTAIN-ELIGIBILITY,


      We hear that you shouted for help at a Town Hall and that is was a mercy that you did not have a stroke – we remember you in our prayers in part because we are concerned about who would replace you – we are certainly better off with the devil we know than one we don’t.  We also pray that God continue to grant our military the grace and strength to support and defend our Constitution.  Our military certainly needs our prayers,  as they are adrift without a Civilian Commander-in-Chief that has confirmed and certain eligibility.


You asked for instructions from your employer?   Good.  You can continue with the following:



re: Budget, Taxes, Money & the Constitution: Points 1 through 7


Due to our well evidenced weakness of character and slowness to learn the lessons of history,
inflation is unavoidable now - it is only a question of how violently inflation will come upon us.
The slower we rise to wisely meet the facts of our reality the faster and more violent will the inflation be.

Sound money efforts are vain until we become wise in our spending and taxing habits.
There is a long establish law regarding currency that we do not have the authority to wish away.
When two currencies are in circulation the more noble currency will be retained and the less noble will be traded until all the noble currency is driven out of circulation –
this will hold true until the less noble currency entirely fails to function as a store of value and medium of exchange.

At this point in the history of our debt acquisition, dramatically increasing our country's productivity is the only way we can avoid the failure of our currency.
The only way we can reasonably hope to buy the time that could permit that growth in productivity is to slow inflation by become more and more and more judicious in our spending.
Inflation acts to destroy our commonly held sense of economic proportion and so confounds any effort to be productive that is not radically near sighted.
Inflation is therefore highly toxic to increased productivity - so is deflation - but that is not much of a problem right now.



1) The only available action that we have the knowledge to take NOW that can be sizable enough to even slow inflation is anabsolute cap on spending of ALL types exception that spending whose yield is so great that it can muster a super majority in Congress.

2) Then the next most useful measure when ranked by both immediacy and effectiveness
is that all public money spending tainted with private or overseas purposes (such as bailouts) must be ended - perhaps only excepting that rare mix of public and private purpose which is compelling enough to muster a super majority in Congress.

Achieving both 1) and 2) will have the immediate benefit of removing many distracting topics from those topics being currently being discussed.

3) Then the next most useful measure when ranked by both immediacy and effectiveness
is that all public money spending tainted with federal agency purpose that is not among Congress's strictly construed enumerated powers in our Constitution.
Those agency's will have their authority completely declared void upon that taint by Congressional declaration that prohibits reexamination by the courts. Both the mission and the funding (proportional to population) of that mission will immediatelydevolve the states should a state lawfully choose to accept that mission. Any money that the state finds wise not to spend the state may keep to use as it pleases. That missions total federal budget for the following year will be reduced by the amount the states saved the previous year. So long as those spending the money are permitted to treat the money spent as someone else's it is practically impossible to rationally optimize costs and benefits - we must do all that is within our power to become wise in our affairs - which means saying no to relationships having inherently flawed structures, no matter how tempting.

4) Then the next most useful measure, ranked high in effectiveness and lower in immediacy
is that all public money spending tainted with substantive law unconstitutionally embedded in the Code of Federal Regulation. All such substantive law is in direct violation of Article I Section 1 as is all legislation that calls for substantive law to be legislated by the executive branch (such as obamaCare, Income Tax, EPA) . All such that have not been funded may not be lawfully funded by Congress, nor may the proposal be funded again until either the proposal has its specification fully legislated Constitutionally or fully devolved to the states.
Moreover every legislator that votes for a 'your will have to pass it to see what it means' legislation exhibits probable cause to have perpetrated and federal felony related to US Frauds & Swindles, demonstrated probable of criminal intent in that act is more questionable.
The re-legislation of these laws gives opportunity to discover what legislators are reprobate and incorrigible with respect to criminal intent.
Recall by indictment and conviction needs to be promptly executed so the replacements may do their job.


5) PREPARING FOR A BALANCED BUDGET:
5A) DEALING WITH DURABLES:
 It this point in the discovery of our inalienable fiscal and moral grounding in "The Law of Nature and Nature's God" those portions of our remaining expense that are substantially different in the lifetime of their benefit that inherently defines the subsequent depreciation and amortization of their cost are readily apparent. Which state will receive the investment and subsequent amortization expense is now subject to debate and perhaps even bidding as a means of settling both the location of the state receiving both the investment and it coupled amortization into cost. It seems that if the nationally scoped investment's operating costs are equal between all locations that the only determinant in to choice of location would be a states bid of years in which the state would bare the amortization. The faster the amortization of investment the higher the bid. In this fashion long term investments are given a current budget value along with a term of years for that commitment.

5B) WHAT IS DURABLE VALUE? - CHECKS & BALANCES:
If a states long term expense commitment in durable investments becomes an unwelcome burden that is the state’s problem.
This must be else there will be no consequence in a states politicians scamming on the future of their state.

5C) BALANCED BUDGET, FairTax, PROSPERITY & LIBERTY by the rule of duly constitutional law
I am not certain yet but I have cause to believe that in order to make the 5B) cause for pause and due judgment stick, both state and federal current expense budgets must be bound by a balanced budget amendment to both state and federal constitutions.
The balanced budget enforcement would be by the rate of national and state sales tax. When the IRS is discovered to be unconstitutional a fairTax proposal of increased scope needs to replace state and federal income taxes and even property taxes and non-user fee taxes (See a discussion to be referenced). This change in tax base would have huge benefits in reducing the overhead and caprice of government releasing a good 10% of our GDP to truly productive enterprise. This last item is the real winner that can save us from debt default and serfdom by hyperinflation and regulation.

6) At this point our currency can be strong enough for us to consider the advantages of a convertible ‘hard’ currency.
Once again the other nations of the world may likely bet on our resilience and durability as a nation relative to their own or any other nation.
The economic and security benefits of this are very substantial.
There may be similar reasons and other substantial reasons for addressing the constitutional requirements of money and having a plan to make our money right.
In doing so we may gain some of the international advantages of having done so before we are actually capable of doing it.
That can buy us more time to get our house in order so hyperinflation won't take it down –
Given the preciousness and economic value of Liberty under the rule of our Constitutionally republican law, even those who hate are unlikely to benefit from our failure.

7) At this point we are likely to be strong enough as a political people to deal with
7A) the ‘war’ on cheap drugs and the acceptance of drug abuse’s stupidity (USA reported with 5% of the worlds people and 25% of its prison population)
7B) the shadow unconstitutional government of the private Federal Reserve Bank
These are very, very, big money issues - If any leader was effectively so out in front of these issues,
that their assassination would likely stop progress on those issues,
it is likely that they would be assassinated one way or another.
Or if the people could be distracted from that purpose by a war then a war would be started.
We are nowhere near strong enough to deal with those two issues NOW – they are dangerous in extreme.

re: A ”Constitutional Reset” Beginning in the Several States: Points 8 through 10


8) Start with a 'Constitutional Reset' in individual states by putting ALL officers of the state court on a very short constitutional leash by recognizing that their customary felonies

are in fact felonies - such that ALL officers of the state court must volunteer their surrender to their a governor and plead for pardon on a strong and particular parole oath with remedy. ALL officers of the state court includes ALL members of the state bar which includes all state judges, justices and state federal judges. Only those who receive pardon prior to indictment and
conviction can escape the essentially permanent disqualification of the US Constitution’s 14th Amendment. In that certain evidence of said felonies is memorialized in the public record and probable cause of statutorily deemed criminal intent is inherent in their professional standing the executive branch must proceed with indictment of those who have not received pardon.


9) Now the state's legislators of both state & federal legislatures come under the same scrutiny for passing unconstitutional laws.


That particular parole oath previously mention is now made statutory for all stations of office including voter, eventually all the way to federal office and office of legal resident alien and citizen.

Knowingly and willingly acquired criminal culpability is much less certain for legislators who are not also officers of the court.


State and Federal laws are examined by the states for constitutionality and constitutional replacements are proposed with unconstitutional federal laws being addressed with a state resolution proposing a model law to congress which if the model law has provisions outside the bounds of Congress' enumerated powers must be in the form of a Congressional authorize-able interstate compact based upon model state legislation.


If the state's legislators (state and federal) then ascribe to felonious legislation (as may be in their personal capacity only) the legislator will have evidence knowing and willing criminal intent and may be recalled by indictment and conviction.


10) The quantity of legislation to be review and fixed or eliminated is so substantial that the several states may wish to coordinate and prioritize their efforts.


Both high yield fixes and easy fixes should be advanced up the queue for early accomplishment. A state's resolution proposing a change in federal legislation can be easily reviewed by every other state and so speed high quality accomplishment of the labor.


Of particular high initial and sustained yield are fixes that reduce the drag on the economy of regulatory caprice. 

This issue needs its own discussion.

A start on addressing the qualitative issues of regulatory caprice is in the discussion "Social Justice Justified? Or a Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Its Affect on Business Risk"
at http://teapartypatriots.ning.com/forum/topics/social-justice-justif...

A start on addressing the quantitative issues of regulatory caprice is in the discussion “We can dig our way out of the current financial mess we are in!?!  at 
http://teapartypatriots.ning.com/forum/topics/we-can-dig-our-way-ou...


But in brief, most of these high value fixes address the unconstitutional inclusion of substantive law in the Code of Federal Regulations (a plain violation of Article I Section 1 ). The IRS and the EPA standout as being particularly worthy of early replacement. Cost and benefit budget issues are easier to address rationally when the underlying enabling legislation is being

re-architectured.  Those worthy federal missions that are outside of federal enumerated powers must devolve to the states - the states should be allowed to keep all the money that they find cost effective not to spend during a federal budget cycle giving the states much more incentive to be rational when evaluating a once-federal mission.

Views: 18

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

#14) of BHO Instructions: Give us a 15 Point Integrated, Just, Liberty Enhancing, Nearly Self-Enforcing Solution to Illegal Immigration, false anchor babies, Criminal renditions of Islam, Voter Apathy & Gov Official’s Criminal Conceit

In short:

1) Clarification of Amendment 14 onFalse Anchor Babies. ( details http://. #Instruction14_01Details )

2)
Offer of citizenship to adult anchor babies onmore proper oath ( details http://. #Instruction14_02Details )


3)
Statutory establishment of a more proper oathestablishing knowing and willingly accepted duty under 18USC4 plus (misprisionof felony & such) for the status of A) Resident Alien, B) NaturalizedCitizen, C) Voter, D) Gov. Office  ( details http://. #Instruction14_03Details )


4)
Violation of the oath is inherently criminal. Violation ofoath establishes that oath is fraud & voidab inito ( details http://. #Instruction14_04Details )


5)
By statute illegal aliens must promptly self-deport or be subject to forfeiture& prison on criminal charge ( details http://. #Instruction14_05Details )


6)
Enhances Liberty, security, economy underConstitutional-republican rule-of-law. ( details http://. #Instruction14_06Details )


7)
Reduces alienation between lawfully established'recent' immigrant community and lawful more established community ( details http://.#Instruction14_07Details )


8)
Makes illegals pariah in the legalimmigrant community - gives them no community to hide in - as they are theenemy of all. ( details http://. #Instruction14_07Details )  Essentially make the illegals
bear the cost oftheir illegality and so makesthe law nearly self enforcing.


9)
Topped off by a FairTax proposal where tax prebates and rebates are only payable to citizens ( details )

10) Optimize Drug Law Impact on Immigration (
details
http://. #Instruction14_10Details )
11) Optimize Immigration’s impact on the cost of government services
( details http://. #Instruction14_11Details )

12) Eliminate Conceit to AMNESTY as it is both felony and VOID ab inito
( details http://. #Instruction14_12Details )

13) Establish Citizenship Requirement: Base Level Competency in the English Language needed to have an initial working knowledge or out Constitutions and Laws ( details http://. #Instruction14_13Details )

14) Establish Citizenship Requirement: Base Level Competency in initial working knowledge or out Constitutions and Laws ( details http://.#Instruction14_14Details )

15) Establish Resident Alien Requirement: Demonstration of Financial Responsibility ( details http://. #Instruction14_15Details )

==========================================================================

Details on “1) Clarification of Amendment 14 on false anchor babies.”  ( back to list http://.. #Instruction14_01short )

All those anchor babies only think they are citizens.  In the particular construction of 8USC1401. “Nationals and citizens of United States at birth”, Congress has confirmed the understanding of the ratifiers of the 14th amendment.  Those known to be born to illegal invaders of United States sovereignty and territory are subject to their parents and to their parents own nation no less than if those parent(s) were of a nation at war with the US and enemy combatants.  Illegal immigrants did not grant their obedience and limited allegiance to the United States authority at the border and so remain under the law of nations rather than the jurisdiction of United States law.   Prior to 8USC1401 (b)( in 1928?) persons of aboriginal nations within the United States were not citizens of the United States and protected by the jurisdiction of US
law as they were under the jurisdiction of tribal law and the law of nations; (not the law of the United States or one of its states unless they became a naturalized citizen and gave up tribal rights).

Given Congressional declaration confirming the original intent as the meaning of the 14th Amendment’s birthright citizenship clause, and the executive branch’s sworn Constitutional obligation to “ take care that the laws be faithfully executed” every conceit to anchor-baby-citizenship advanced by an officer of the government is criminally intentional felony 18USC1341-1346 “Frauds & Swindles” and insurrection in support of alien invaders that brings that perpetrating officer under the 14th Amendments disqualification clause .  Currently those felonies are threatening our national security.

We will lose the Islamic "Battle-of-the-Babies" in their multi-generation plan to conquer the west if we do no remove this perpetration of felony that we have tolerated by fraud and ignorance in the past. 

An Executive Order recognizing these things in instruction to POTUS subordinates would be useful and is demanded by the POTUS’s employers.
---------------------------------------------------------


8USC1401. “Nationals and citizens of United States at birth”
“The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
(a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;
(b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe: Provided, That the granting of citizenship under this subsection shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of such person to tribal or other property;
(c) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person;
(d) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the birth of such person, and the other of whom is a national, but not a citizen of the United States;
(e) a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person;
(f) a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States;
(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288of title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person
(A)honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or
(B)employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section
288of title 22, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date; and
(h)a person born before noon (Eastern Standard Time) May 24, 1934, outside the limits and jurisdiction of the United States of an alien father and a mother who is a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, had resided in the United States.”

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

From  http://www.14thamendment.us/birthright_citizenship/original_intent....

The SCOTUS has essentially stated that the status of the parents determines the citizenship of the child. To qualify children for birthright citizenship, based on the 14th Amendment, parents must owe "direct and immediate allegiance" to the U.S. and be "completely subject" to its jurisdiction. In other words, they must be United States citizens.

Congress subsequently passed a special act to grant full citizenship to American Indians, who were not citizens even through they were born within the borders of the United States. The Citizens Act of 1924, codified in 8USCSß1401, provides that:

The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
(a) a person born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;
(b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe.

In 1889, the Wong Kim Ark Supreme Court case10,11 once again, in a ruling based strictly on the 14th Amendment, concluded that the status of the parents was crucial in determining the citizenship of the child. The current misinterpretation of the 14th Amendment is based in part upon the presumption that the
Wong Kim Ark
ruling encompassed illegal aliens. In fact, it did not address the children of illegal aliens and non-immigrant aliens, but rather determined an allegiance for legal immigrant parents based on the meaning of the word domicil(e). Since it is inconceivable that illegal alien parents could have a legal
domicile in the United States, the ruling clearly did not extend birthright citizenship to children of illegal alien parents. Indeed, the ruling strengthened the original intent of the 14thAmendment.
. . . . . . .


For more information, see:
1. P.A. Madison,Former Research Fellow in Constitutional Studies, The UnConstitutionality of Citizenship by Birth to Non-Americans(February 1, 2005)

2. Madeleine PelnerCosman, Ph.D., Esq., Illegal Aliens and American Medicine The Journal of the American Physicians and Surgeons , Volume 10 Number 1 (Spring 2005)

3. Al Knight, Track 'anchor babies', Denver Post (September 11, 2002)

4. Al Knight, Change U.S. law on anchor babies, Denver Post (June 22, 2005)

5. Tom DeWeese, The Mexican Fifth Column (January 27, 2003)

6. Anchor Babies: The Children of Illegal Aliens ( Federation for American Immigration Reform)

7. Tom DeWeese, The Outrages of the Mexican Invasion ( American policy Center)

8. P.A. Madison, Alien Birthright Citizenship: A Fable That Lives Through Ignorance The Federalist Blog (December17, 2005)

9. Dr. John C. Eastman, Professor of Law, Chapman University School of Law, Director, The Claremont Institute Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, Dual Citizenship, Birthright Citizenship, and the Meaning of Sovere... - Testimony, U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security and Claims (September 29, 2005)

10. William Buchanan, HR-73 -- Protecting America's Sovereignty, The Social Contract (Fall, 1999) - includes discussion of the related Wong Kim Ark 1898 Supreme Court case

11. Charles Wood, Losing Control of the Nation's Future -- Part Two -- Birthright Cit..., The Social Contract (Winter, 2005) - includes discussion of the related Wong Kim Ark court case

12. U.S. Supreme Court ELK v. WILKINS, 112 U.S. 94 (Findlaw, 1884)

13. U.S. Supreme Court Slaughter-House cases ('Lectric Law Library, 1873) http://www.lectlaw.com/files/case30.htm

"THE LAW OF NATIONS" OR "PRINCIPLES OF THE LAW OF NATURE APPLIED TO THE CONDUCT AND AFFAIRS OF NATIONS AND SOVEREIGNS" FROM THE FRENCH OF MONSIEUR EMMERICH DE VATTEL.WITH ADDITIONAL NOTES AND REFERENCES, By EDWARD D. INGRAHAM, Esq. and JUDGE BEVERLY TUCKER, Professor of Law in William &Mary College 1883 http://www.constitution.org/vattel/vattel_cmt.htm as evidence of that meeting of the minds had by Virginia’s ratifiers of the 14th Amendment
Book 1 Chap. 19. — It is a common error "That, by the Law of Nature," a man's native Country is the place of his birth, and that it is positive Law that makes him a member of the society to which his father belongs. The reverse is true.  To be a member of any society is to have certain rights, and to owe certain duties.  By the Law of Nature the Son inherits his Father's acquisitions, and, among these his rights.  But rights have their correlative duties. Claiming one he must perform the other. What matter then where he is born? 
He who is by the Law of Nature a native of one Country, and, by positive Law, a native of another, may have rights in both; but his natural duties belong to the first. His allegiance cannot be due to both.”

===================================================================

Details on 2) Offer of citizenship to adult anchor babies onmore proper oath  ( back to list http://.. #Instruction14_02short ) Even though it is established that "Anchor Babies" automatic citizenship NEVER were truly Constitutional and lawful that is no reason why we should not or cannot graciously naturalize those family loving, good working, adult neighbors that contribute much to our culture and prosperity. 
It seems foolish for US citizens to offend them at the fault of our past ignorance when we can profitably embrace those who have proved themselves worthy.  Most of the Hispanics I have meet would make great citizens - 
BUT Ambiguity breeds caprice and alienation – POISON big time! 
We need to fix that fast – in 2011.

See Draft new properly specific oath at this link

===================================================================

Details on 3) Statutory establishment of a more proper oath   ( back to list #Instruction14_03short )

It is vastly practical for Congress to sweeten what might be a bitter pill to deluded anchor babies by requiring a new, more particular oath of office that is required and yet essential the same for the offices of 1)Resident Alien, 2)Naturalized Citizen, 3) Voter, 4) local, state or federal office (includes employment). 

Evidenced by oath, the knowing and willing embrace of existing duties that every person in the USA has under 18USC4 "Misprision of Felony"  relative to the felonies like:
illegal drugs (state law with possible interstate compact to Constitutionally achieve the benefits of reciprocally uniform law enforcement),
illegal immigration (state law with possible interstate compact to Constitutionally achieve the benefits of reciprocally uniform law enforcement),
color:#085F98'>18USC2381Treason
[ being one of the "Whoever" . . ."adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere"
] ( from http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00002381... ) and likely or at least 18USC2382. “Misprision of Treason ”     from http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00002382... ,
18USC4 “Misprision ofFelony”   from http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00000004... ,
18USC2383. “Rebellion or Insurrection” from http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00002383... ,
18USC2384. Seditious Conspiracy    from http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00002384... ,
18USC2385. Advocating overthrow ,      from http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00002385... , or
18USC1341 "Frauds & Swindles "          from http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00001341...

Such an oath would be particularly advantageous to Muslims in that the words of Mohammed and his imams that are addressed to the countrymen in Muslim countries regarding civil, judicial and military authority cannot be applied to Muslims in the USA who are not Mohammed’s countrymen without making all Muslims in the USA perpetrate felony.

In the absence of the clarity that such an oath brings and the application of civil law in immigration matters, the unrebutted preponderance of evidence of the Qur’an and Hadith is all that is needed to expel Muslim immigrants and Muslim falsely-naturalized citizens whose citizenship is made VOID <i>ab inito</i> by evidenced fraud in their citizenship oath taking.

========================================================================

Detail on 4) Violation of the oath is inherently criminal. Violation ofoath establishes that oath is fraud & voidab inito ( back to list #Instruction14_04short )

========================================================================

Detail on 5) By statute illegal aliens must promptly self-deport or be subject to forfeiture& prison on criminal charge ( href="#Instruction14_05short"> back to list #Instruction14_05short )
========================================================================

Detail on 6) Enhances Liberty, security, economy underConstitutional-republican rule-of-law. ( back to list #Instruction14_06short )

========================================================================

Detail on 7) Reduces alienation between lawfully established'recent' immigrant community and lawful more established community (back to list #Instruction14_07short )

========================================================================

Detail on 8) Makes illegals pariah in the legalimmigrant community - gives them no community to hide in - as they are theenemy of all. ( back to list #Instruction14_08short )

Essentially make the illegals bear the cost oftheir illegality and so makes the law nearly self enforcing.

========================================================================

Detail on 9) Topped off by a FairTax proposal where tax prebates and rebates are only payable to citizens ( back to list #Instruction14_09short )

========================================================================

Details on 10) Optimize Drug Law Impact on Immigration ( back to list #Instruction14_10short )

We have additional cause to be circumspect in that some illegal immigrants are there in large part because of unintended consequences of our ill-considered US PROHIBITION on recreational drugs other than alcohol.  These laws have unintentionally caused our nation great suffering, outlawry and corruption, much as our experiment with ALCOHOL PROHIBITION did.  It is evident that, as a people, we mature in time.  Look at the GREAT progress we have made with alcohol and tobacco abuse that has come about just because we understood that the abuse is both rude and stupid, but not truly criminal unless made criminal in the perpetration of particular negligent criminal wrong. 

As it is now, the financial cream of our economy is being dumped upon the criminal portions of our neighbors to the south and is poisoning their homelands with violence and corruption more significant in harm than many actual wars.  Many aliens would even chose to go home if their country’s lawlessness declined on the loss of its financial motivation.

As much as federal drug laws are really trespasses onto the domain of state prerogative that must be returned to the states during ‘Constitutional Reset’ there is good cause to deport non-violent aliens imprisoned for the cause of those unconstitutionally void federal laws.  All other prisoners held under such void federal law should be released in an orderly fashion.  There is great economy to the US in this move.  Currently it appears that we have 25% of the world’s prisoners but only 5% of the world’s population.  Our federal drug laws are a substantial cause of the toxic alienation that our imprisonment statistics represent.  See BHO instruction #5B) for reservations regarding the practical constraints on the timing of this portion of our nation’s healing. 

With respect to Virginia’s management of its well-being upon this Constitutional reset, one of my desires is that the Commonwealth owned ABC monopoly be retained as an optimal cost method of maximizing excise tax on distilled spirits (and the like).  To these duties the sale of recreational drugs could be added under controlled form, purity and strength.  Upon this benefit may be added a customer-signed warning of health hazards and notice of statutory duty to limit use to a privately responsible manner.  Widely dispersed liquor stores are an attractive nuisance with an externalized high policing cost - that subsidizes excess capacity and hence lowers the maximum sustainable excise tax receipts needed to offset the Commonwealth’s costs that are collateral to all recreational drug consumption.

========================================================================

Details on 11) Optimize Immigration’s impact on the cost of government services ( back to list #Instruction14_11short )
Please make suggestions and offer well supported links to detail this.
Please note that a direct denial of non-citizen public education and emergency health services appears contrary to “"THE LAW OF NATIONS" OR "PRINCIPLES OF THE LAW OF NATURE APPLIED TO THE CONDUCT AND AFFAIRS OF NATIONS AND SOVEREIGNS" FROM THE FRENCH OF MONSIEUR DE VATTEL. WITH ADDITIONAL NOTES AND REFERENCES, By EDWARD D. INGRAHAM, Esq. at http://www.constitution.org/vattel/vattel_cmt.htm  .

========================================================================

Details on 12) Conceit to AMNESTY is both felony and VOID ab inito  ( back to list #Instruction14_12short )

The POTUS being lawfully bound by US Constitution Art. 2 Sect.3 Clause 4 "he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed" has authority to PARDON but not to give AMNESTY

All conceits of authority by officers of the executive branch of government to grant AMNESTY is felony perpetrated in personal capacity only

Neither may Congressmen pass a law granting AMNESTY as such a law would be "ex post facto”.

All conceits of authority by officers of the legislative branch of government to grant AMNESTY is felony perpetrated in personal capacity only.

Neither may any beneficiary of, and accessory to, such felony lawfully claim the benefit of that fraud, perpetrated without lawful authority, as the act was VOID ab inito.

There is NO statute of limitation on the sworn duty of the executive branches of state and federal governments to prosecute those felonies!

All citizenship gained under the color of such fraud is additional felony and VOID ab inito.

All voting perpetrated under the color of such fraud is additional felony and VOID ab inito.

========================================================================

Detail on 13) Citizenship Requirement: Base Level Competency in the English Language needed to have an initial working knowledge or out Constitutions and Laws   ( back to list #Instruction14_13short )
Please make suggestions and offer well supported links to detail this.

========================================================================

Detail on 14) Citizenship Requirement: Base Level Competency in initial working knowledge or out Constitutions and Laws   ( back to list #Instruction14_14short )
Please make suggestions and offer well supported links to detail this.

========================================================================

Detail on 15) Resident Alien Requirement: Demonstration of Financial Responsibility ( back to list #Instruction14_15short )
Please make suggestions and offer well supported links to detail this.  I believe we could fairly model ours after Mexico’s.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

****************************

 

U.S. DEBT CLOCK

****************************

 


 

 

(sales help fund this site)

 

Badge

Loading…

© 2021   Created by Tom Whitmore.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service