Grassroots Network of the Republican Party of Virginia

The tenth amendment appears to have had long reach with long claws and teeth all along

The tenth amendment appears to have had long reach with long claws and teeth all along - all it takes is and local sheriff, local prosecutor and state governor that will obey their sworn and statutory duties under our Constitutions.  In such case even the POTUS is bound to see that the laws are faithfully executed short of the POTUS perpetrating insurrection (USConst.Art2S3c4).

NO one need be taken by surprise in this.  We can all get along unless one of us chooses otherwise – otherwise the full weight of the law written within the hearts of 300 million or so people and all their ancestors must fall upon criminal conceit.

In that State Law,  MUST bind the judgment of any federal court within its state in accord with the terms of 28USC453 on a Judge’s Oath , 28USC1652 on State Law as the Rule of Decision and Va19.2-265.2 & Va 8.01-386 “Judicial notice of laws” “A. Whenever ”. . .” it becomes necessary to ascertain what the law ”. . .” of this Commonwealth, ”. . .”, of the United States”. . .”  the court shall take judicial notice thereof whether specially pleaded or not such that FRE#302 and FRE#201 are modified so that federal judges are deemed to have taken notice of the laws
by their profession license as officers of the courts such they may not lawfully plead ignorance of the law upon the perpetration of Va18.2-481(5) statutory treason and/or Va18.2-111 statutory embezzlement of the laws.  

NO such criminally perpetrated ruling in either state or federal court is EVER FINAL in that it is a fraud upon the court.

Even a supreme court ruling against both federal and state Constitutions and duly authorized statutes is more than likely 18USC1341 "Frauds & Swindles" in the supreme court justices' personal capacity only as the may only constitutionally hold their offices during good behavior (USCost.Art3s1).

State locality jurisdiction courts appear to have indictment and arrest duty upon ANY offending US supreme court justice (at least in all states bound by the like of Va1-248, VA§19.2-191

If I missed something here I would sure like to know.

Views: 32

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Russell, you didn't miss a thing. that is why the federal government views these state laws as being so perplexing.
. β~}
"A violation of 18USC2381 Treason upon deprecating our Constitution that gives any state a cause for lawful withdrawal from our Constitution upon failure-of-consideration"

When any person in any state is wronged by a deprecation of our Constitution's supremacy that wrong is a violation of 18USC2381Treason or at least probable cause of an attempt to perpetrate that felony. This statement may reasonably raise your eyebrows or more. Even so it is appears testably true. This world is still a dangerous place. We cannot afford to let anyone give any of our states cause to go its separate way outside of the fold of our Constitution even if the state lawfully did so retaining affinity and a reduced unity under the still standing "Articles of Confederation". See preamble re:Articles of Confederation

When ANYONE within the jurisdiction of the United States so functionally deprecates our Constitution's supremacy that they give ANOTHER cause to be alienated from the rights and duties devolving from that supremacy that ANYONE, potentially, gives the wronged person's state a reasoned cause to abandon our Constitution for failure-of-consideration.

In doing so, that ANYONE perpetrates probable cause of attempted 18USC2381Treason . That extremity is moderated by the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt criteria and jury trial required to obtain conviction.

On the face of any such criminal process against that ANYONE:
1) not deemed to know the law and the constitution (to that particular) in statutory accord with their professional standing or
2) not given timely and particular prior notice of the law and the Constitution
it would be nearly impossible to establish probable cause of criminal intent to the violation beyond a reasonable doubt, such that any so il- formed a prosecution should be abuse of process obligating the disbarment of the prosecutor.

In this fashion every state can have most of the protection Virginia has in Va18.2481(5) statutory treason, "resisting the execution of the laws under the color of its authority"

Reply to Discussion









(sales help fund this site)




© 2022   Created by Tom Whitmore.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service